Mechanical dryers
Machines that dry coffee with forced, heated air – static beds, rotating drums, vertical columns and silos. How they move air and coffee, how they are heated and fuelled, and how they are run without harming the seed.
Across the chain: Equipment
Contents
In brief
- Mechanical dryers force heated air through the coffee and finish drying in about 24–72 hours, against about 7–20 days on patios.4
- The main types are static beds, rotating drums (guardiolas), vertical columns and silos with near-ambient air.2,4,10
- A heat exchanger keeps combustion gases out of the drying air; parchment husk is a common fuel for it.3,6
- Air and coffee have separate limits – Cenicafé caps drying air at 50 °C in static layers; Brazilian manuals cap the coffee mass at 40–45 °C.1,6,7
- The Codex code names over-drying as the most common problem of mechanical drying; it costs weight and income.8
What a mechanical dryer does#
A mechanical dryer pushes heated air through a mass of coffee until the coffee reaches a safe moisture. Its main parts are a heat source, a fan and a drying chamber.2,3 Mechanical dryers finish drying in about 24–72 hours, depending on batch size, coffee moisture and design.4 An Embrapa manual gives 24–36 hours.6 Patios need about 7–20 days.4
Dryers rarely work alone. The Codex code of practice notes that they are usually used to complete drying after sun-drying.8 It names two things an operator must control: the temperature of the air going in and the drying time.8
Why coffee dries, and how fast, is explained in the drying entry; the safe moisture and water-activity end points are in moisture and water activity. This entry is about the machines and how they are run.
The main types of dryer#
Dryers differ in one main way: whether the coffee stays still while the air moves, or the coffee moves too.
Static-bed dryers. The coffee lies in a deep bed on a perforated floor, and hot air is blown through it.4 Cenicafé, the Colombian coffee research centre, describes layers of up to 40 cm, with the air direction reversed every 6–12 hours.1 Its “silo-secador” has two chambers side by side: one dries, the other pre-dries wet coffee.1,2 Two- and three-level versions stack these chambers, so the coffee moves down by gravity.1
Rotating drum dryers (guardiolas). A metal drum turns slowly on its axis, below 2 rpm.2 Hot air enters a perforated tube along the centre, passes outwards through the coffee and leaves through the perforated drum wall.2 The constant tumbling exposes the beans evenly to the air.4 According to Cenicafé, guardiolas are chosen above all for an even final moisture, but they are expensive, hard to maintain and use heat poorly.2
Vertical column dryers. In a common cross-flow design, parchment fills a tall column, often 1–2 m high, and moves down by gravity to an outlet at the bottom. Hot air is blown across the column from one side.4 In Cenicafé’s intermittent concurrent-flow dryer, coffee and air flow downwards together in the drying chamber.2 A rest chamber above it holds coffee out of the hot air.2
Silo dryers. A silo blows air only slightly warmer than ambient through deep coffee, so drying is slow but cheap in energy.10 In a Brazilian trial the air was about 2 °C above ambient, and finishing took 22–24 days.10
Solar and hybrid dryers sit between patios and machines. Cenicafé considers solar dryers the only option mainly on farms producing less than 3,500 kg a year.2 Hybrid dryers add a furnace or fan to a solar dryer and need less fuel and electricity than fully mechanical dryers.4
Dehumidified air. Air can be made drier instead of hotter. One Brazilian study dried parchment in a fixed-bed dryer at low air temperatures with the dew point of the air controlled.14
Heat sources and fuels#
The heat comes from burning husk, wood, oil or gas, or from electricity.4 How the flame meets the air matters for the coffee.
Indirect firing. The fuel burns in a furnace, and its hot gases pass through a heat exchanger. The exchanger heats the drying air without mixing the combustion gases into it.3 Cenicafé states that combustion gases must not touch the coffee.1 An Embrapa manual prefers indirect-fired furnaces so that the coffee does not take on a smoke odour.6
Direct firing. The flame heats the drying air itself, so the combustion gases pass through the coffee. According to a 2022 Cenicafé study, solid and liquid fuels are burnt with a heat exchanger, while dryers fired with LPG are usually installed without one.5 The study dried coffee with directly burnt liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). It found no polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in most samples and no cup defects.5 When the gas burnt incompletely, the parchment and the beans turned black.5
Fuels. Parchment husk, called cisco in Colombia, is the dried parchment (endocarp) removed from the seed.8 It is a common fuel for heat exchangers.2,3 Every 100 kg of dry parchment yields about 18 kg of husk.3 An Embrapa manual recommends coffee husk or well-dried wood.6 An Incaper manual recommends dry wood from eucalyptus or coffee.7 Cenicafé also lists coal, diesel and propane; burning coke releases sulphur, which corrodes metal parts.1
Air temperature and coffee temperature#
A dryer has two temperatures, and they are not the same. The air temperature is measured where hot air enters. The coffee (mass) temperature is measured inside the coffee, with thermometers placed in the mass.15 Wet coffee stays cooler than the air. In one Brazilian dryer, air at about 70 °C held the coffee mass at a mean maximum of 44.9 °C.9
The limits are set on both:
- Air: Cenicafé caps drying air at 50 °C for parchment in static-layer dryers.1,2 Its intermittent concurrent-flow dryer was tested with air at 87 °C.2 An Embrapa manual allows up to 80 °C at the air inlet.6
- Coffee mass: The same Embrapa manual caps the coffee mass at 45 °C, and below 30 °C when many green fruits are present.6 An Incaper manual sets 40 °C in the mass.7 A Lavras study states, citing earlier work, that mass temperatures above 40 °C damage quality.15
The type-specific limits (parchment and natural coffee) and the evidence on seed damage are covered in the drying entry. Too much heat on unripe fruit also has a visible cost: the Codex code links black beans to immature beans dried at excessive inlet temperature.8
Running a dryer with a patio and rest periods#
Many farms combine sun and machine. Coffee is pre-dried on a patio or in a pre-dryer, then finished in the dryer.6,8 Each load should hold coffee of the same moisture.6 The pulped natural entry describes why sticky coffee is loaded only after its mucilage has dried in the sun.
Drying can also be split into passes with a rest in between. During a rest, the coffee is out of the hot air, and moisture moves from the inside of the seed to the outside.2 An Incaper manual stops the dryer overnight from 22:00 once the coffee is half-dry (about 25% moisture, wet basis). Drying resumes the next day.7 Longer rests between passes are covered in the Deep dive. The rest after drying, before hulling, is a separate step: see resting.
Reference values#
The table collects the operating values reported in the sources. They describe practice and trials, not a single correct setting.
| Parameter | Value reported | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Drying time, mechanical dryers | 24–72 h, depending on batch size, coffee moisture and design; drum residence times 12–36 h | Duque-Dussán et al.4 |
| Drying time, heated-air dryers | 24–36 h | Embrapa6 |
| Drying time, Cenicafé dryers | 18–32 h, depending on dryer type | Cenicafé2 |
| Static bed depth | Up to 40 cm; 0.4 m per layer in the silo-secador; 0.1–0.3 m per layer in three-level dryers | Cenicafé1 |
| Static bed depth (review) | 20–40 cm, air blown up or down through the bed | Duque-Dussán et al.4 |
| Air reversal, static beds | Every 6–12 h | Cenicafé1 |
| Airflow, static layers | 25 m³/(min·m³) of coffee = 66 m³/(min·t) dry parchment; 20 m³/(min·m²) in the silo-secador | Cenicafé 20001 |
| Airflow, minimum | 38 m³/(min·m³) = 100 m³/(min·t) dry parchment | Cenicafé 20172 |
| Airflow for ≤ 24 h drying | 98–102 m³/(min·t) dry parchment | Cenicafé 20093 |
| Silo-secador capacity | 60–500 arrobas (750–6,250 kg) of dry parchment | Cenicafé1 |
| Three-level dryer | Air 50 °C; coffee moved down after 4–6 h; one dry layer out every 8 h; 20–24 h in total | Cenicafé1 |
| Drum speed (guardiola) | Below 2 rpm | Cenicafé2 |
| Column height, cross-flow dryers | Often 1–2 m | Duque-Dussán et al.4 |
| Air temperature, maximum (static layers) | 50 °C | Cenicafé1,2 |
| Air temperature, concurrent-flow dryer test | 87 °C | Cenicafé2 |
| Air temperature at inlet, maximum | 80 °C, with coffee mass ≤ 45 °C | Embrapa6 |
| Coffee mass temperature, maximum | 45 °C; below 30 °C with many green fruits | Embrapa6 |
| Coffee mass temperature, maximum | 40 °C (indirect furnaces) | Incaper7 |
| Temperature control, husk-fired exchanger | Fuel feed switched on at 48 °C and off at 52 °C | Cenicafé3 |
| Heat exchanger efficiency | Should exceed 50%; two units tested at 45 and 52% | Cenicafé3 |
| Parchment husk, calorific value | 17,936 kJ/kg at 20% moisture (anthracite 33,440 kJ/kg) | Cenicafé3 |
| Parchment husk, yield | 18 kg per 100 kg dry parchment | Cenicafé3 |
| Fuel use, husk-fired exchanger | 4.4 kg husk per arroba (12.5 kg) of dry parchment | Cenicafé3 |
| Fuel use, coal and diesel | 3.5 kg granulated coal or 0.7 gallons diesel per arroba of dry parchment | Cenicafé1 |
| Energy per kg of water removed | About 4,000–5,500 kJ (typical) | Duque-Dussán et al.4 |
| Energy, concurrent and counter-current dryer (incl. fan electricity) | 11,705–14,713 kJ/kg at about 44 °C with intermittent stirring; 10,544–11,135 kJ/kg at 70 °C with continuous mixing | Martin et al.9 |
| Energy, combined drying trial | 10,945 kJ/kg complete drying in a fixed-bed dryer with indirect-fired furnace; 19,138 kJ/kg heated-air pre-drying to about 25% (wb) in the same type of dryer, then 193 kJ/kg silo finishing with near-ambient air | Palacin et al.10 |
| Overall energy efficiency | 20–40% static and cross-flow; 40–60% optimised rotary and drum | Duque-Dussán et al.4 |
| Thermal efficiency, static silos (estimate) | 22% overall, at 0.4 m bed and 30 m³/(min·m²) | Cenicafé2 |
| Final moisture uniformity target | Coefficient of variation below 6.5% | Cenicafé2 |
| End point | 10–12% moisture (purchase range in Colombia) | Cenicafé2 |
One arroba is 12.5 kg: Cenicafé equates 60 arrobas with 750 kg of dry parchment.1
How each dryer moves air and coffee#
Static beds and the moisture front. In a static bed, the coffee nearest the air inlet dries first, and moisture gradients form along the airflow path.1,4 Reversing the air direction evens out the final moisture.2 In the two-level dryer, only the lower chamber has air reversal.2 A three-level dryer can also run without reversal, moving coffee from chamber to chamber instead. This version costs least to build but needs the most labour.2 Too little airflow lengthens drying; too much raises the cost of fan and heat.1
Drums. In a guardiola the air path is radial: from the central tube, through the turning coffee, out through the drum wall.2 The air that leaves still carries much drying capacity, especially late in drying, and that capacity is lost.2 The honey process entry explains why tumbling suits sticky coffees.
Columns and concurrent flow. In concurrent flow, coffee and air both enter the drying chamber at the top and move down together, so the hottest air meets the wettest coffee.2 In a Brazilian concurrent and counter-current dryer with a rest chamber, the grain temperature stayed within recommended values even with air at 70 °C.9
Silos with near-ambient air. In a Brazilian combined system, pulped and mechanically demucilaged coffee (cereja descascado e desmucilado) was pre-dried with heated air to about 25% (wb). It was loaded into a 51.7 m³ silo in successive lots of 4.8 m³: the bottom lot entered at 25% and the top lot at 18% (wb).10 The fan delivered 58 m³/min; per cubic metre of coffee this fell from 10.82 to 1.14 m³/min as the silo filled.10 The coffee ended at 11.3% (wb) at the bottom and 12.2% at the top.10 According to a university guide, silo drying uses electricity over a long period, and in humid regions a low-cost supplementary heat source is needed.11<Dehumidified air. In the dew-point study, parchment was dried in two steps at several controlled dew points. The authors report that the drying conditions had a significant effect on cup quality and recommend the warmer, moderately dry setting they tested.14 The study appeared in a journal rated Tier B here, so its values are not given.>
Smoke and combustion taints#
Combustion gases are kept away from the coffee in Colombian and Brazilian guidance.1,6 According to a 2026 review, smoke recirculated from biomass furnaces can give smoky or phenolic notes, so furnaces must burn completely and keep air and gas apart.4
The only study opened for this entry that measured contamination tested LPG. Washed coffee was dried at 50 ± 1 °C in a static-bed dryer without a heat exchanger, to 10–12% (wb).5 Most samples had no detectable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Where PAHs appeared, they measured 0.08–4.1 µg/kg, and none of the 17 PAHs considered carcinogenic was found.5 Cups scored 80.09–82.69 points without defects. Drying took somewhat longer than with the electric control.5 With a deliberately incomplete (yellow) flame, parchment and beans turned black, which the authors consider not appropriate.5 Solid fuels were not tested.
Tempering and rest between passes#
Cenicafé defines rest time as the time the grains are not exposed to the hot air stream; moisture then diffuses from inside to outside.2 Some dryers build this in. In the Brazilian concurrent and counter-current dryer, treatment at about 44 °C needed about 24 h of drying plus 12 h of rest; at 70 °C with continuous mixing, about 12 h of drying.9
Longer rests have been tested in boxes between passes:
- Natural coffee. Drying in fixed-bed dryers (10 cm layers, mass at 40 ± 1 °C) was stopped at 20, 17 or 14% (wb), and the coffee rested 5, 15 or 30 days.12 Cup quality improved as the rest lengthened. Stopping at 17 or 20% did not change quality compared with complete drying on the patio.12
- Parchment coffee. After two days on the patio, coffee was dried at 40 °C mass temperature to 16, 20 or 24% (wb), rested 2, 6 or 12 days, then dried to 11% (wb).13 Drying could be interrupted at up to 24% and rested up to 12 days without fermentation. Rests of 2 and 6 days gave lower electrical conductivity than continuous drying.13
Both trials were small-scale; the 2014 authors call for full-scale studies.13 Short interruptions of mechanical drying and their microbial and ochratoxin A results are described in the drying entry.
Uniformity and over-drying#
Layers in a static bed. In multi-layer dryers, the outer layers can fall to 6–7% moisture (basis not stated) while the centre layers still dry.1 Operators stop when samples show no under-dried beans, which over-dries the outer layers. Cenicafé suggests switching to ambient air near the target moisture to limit this.1 In a test of the silo-secador, coffee in the drying chamber reached 7.9% (wb) while the pre-drying chamber held 10.4%.2 Loading batches one after another gave a more even final moisture than loading them at the same time.2
Cost of over-drying. The Codex code names over-drying as the most common problem with mechanical dryers, causing weight and income loss.8 An Embrapa manual adds that coffee below 11% (basis not stated) loses weight and breaks in hulling.6 According to a 2026 review, over-dried or heat-damaged coffees often show lower complexity.4
Energy use#
Typical values. A 2026 review gives about 4,000–5,500 kJ per kilogram of water removed as typical.4 It does not name a primary study for this range. It puts overall energy efficiency at 20–40% for static and cross-flow dryers and 40–60% for optimised rotary and drum dryers.4 Losses come from poor insulation, excess airflow and incomplete combustion. Fans, blowers and rotating parts add a significant share.4 Cenicafé estimates 22% overall efficiency for its static silo dryers at one operating point.2
Measured values. Measured specific consumption is higher than the review’s range. A Brazilian concurrent and counter-current dryer used 10,544–14,713 kJ/kg including fan electricity; mixing continuously at 70 °C used less than intermittent operation at about 44 °C.9 In the combined-drying trial, complete drying in a fixed-bed dryer with an indirect-fired furnace used 10,945 kJ/kg. In the combined system, heated-air pre-drying to about 25% (wb) used 19,138 kJ/kg, and finishing in the silo with near-ambient air took only 193 kJ/kg.10
Data table
| Point | kJ per kg water removed | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Typical for coffee drying (2026 review) | 4,000–5,500 | 4000–5500 | 4 |
| Concurrent/counter-current dryer, about 44 °C air, intermittent stirring (incl. electricity) | 11,705–14,713 | 11704.7–14713.2 | 9 |
| Same dryer, 70 °C air, continuous mixing (incl. electricity) | 10,544–11,135 | 10544–11134.8 | 9 |
| Fixed-bed dryer, indirect-fired furnace | 10,945 | 10945 | 10 |
| Combined system: heated-air pre-drying to about 25% (wb) | 19,138 | 19138 | 10 |
| Silo finishing, air about 2 °C above ambient | 193 | 193 | 10 |
Saving fuel. Combining sun and machine saves the most. Cenicafé reports that solar pre-drying, to about 40% moisture (basis not stated) in one or two days, shortens silo drying by 22.4–66.7%. This cuts fuel and electricity use by up to 50%.3 A university guide also reports fuel savings when a pre-dryer, a dryer and a storage silo are combined.11 Husk alone does not cover the whole harvest: by our calculation from Cenicafé’s figures, 18 kg of husk per 100 kg dry parchment meets about half of the 4.4 kg per arroba (35 kg per 100 kg) burnt in its husk-fired exchanger.3
Risks and defects#
- Smoke taint – combustion gases in the drying air can give the coffee a smoke odour.6 Incomplete combustion of directly burnt LPG blackened parchment and beans.5
- Black beans – immature beans dried at excessive inlet temperature turn black.8
- Thermal damage – coffee-mass temperatures above 40 °C cause thermal damage, according to a Lavras study citing earlier work.15 Natural coffee is more sensitive to heated-air drying than washed coffee.15
- Uneven moisture – beans near the air inlet dry faster than those near the outlet.4
- Over-drying – weight and income loss, and breakage in hulling.6,8
- Mechanical stress – high airflow may increase the risk of mechanical stress and breakage.4
- Corrosion – sulphur from burning coke forms acid that corrodes metal parts.1
Open questions#
- Energy benchmarks. The measured values lie well above the review’s typical range.4,9,10 No study opened for this entry measured energy use in a commercial guardiola.
- Taints from solid fuels. PAHs were measured only for direct LPG firing.5 No study opened for this entry measured PAHs or smoke compounds in coffee from husk- or wood-fired dryers with leaking heat exchangers.
- Rest length at scale. Multi-day rests between passes were tested in small lots in boxes; their effect in full-size dryers is not established.12,13
- Dehumidified air. The dew-point study reports cup scores but no energy use, so the cost of drying with dehumidified air is not quantified here.14
Key studies#
Quintero Yepes, Rodríguez Valencia & Ortiz, 2022 – Direct LPG firing and the bean. Washed coffee was dried at 50 °C in a static dryer heated by directly burnt LPG, with electric heating as the control. Most samples carried no detectable PAHs and the cups showed no defects, but a deliberately incomplete flame turned the coffee black.
Martin et al., 2009 – Energy in a two-stage column dryer. A dryer with a concurrent first stage, a rest chamber and a counter-current second stage was run at about 44 °C with intermittent stirring and at 70 °C with continuous mixing. The hotter, mixed regime used less energy per kilogram of water while the grain stayed within recommended temperatures.
Palacin et al., 2009 – Combined drying with a silo. Pulped, demucilaged coffee was pre-dried with heated air and finished in a silo with air about 2 °C above ambient, compared with patio and hybrid drying. Silo finishing took 22–24 days but very little energy, while the heated-air pre-drying used more energy per kilogram of water than complete drying in the hybrid dryer, and the authors conclude that the combined system preserves quality if well operated.
Isquierdo et al., 2012 – Rest periods for natural coffee. Natural coffee in fixed-bed dryers was stopped at three moisture levels and rested for 5–30 days before drying resumed. Longer rests gave better cups, and stopping at 17 or 20% did not lower quality against patio drying.
Borém et al., 2014 – Intermittent drying of parchment. Parchment coffee was dried to 16–24% moisture, tempered for 2–12 days and then finished, and assessed after twelve months of storage. Interruption up to 24% caused no fermentation, and short tempering gave lower electrical conductivity than continuous drying.
- Airflow for static layers: a 2000 Cenicafé bulletin recommends 25 m³ per minute per m³ of coffee, equal to 66 m³/(min·t) of dry parchment1, while Cenicafé’s 2017 handbook gives a minimum of 38 m³/(min·m³), equal to 100 m³/(min·t)2, and a 2009 Cenicafé bulletin recommends 98–102 m³/(min·t) so that drying does not exceed 24 h.3
- Direct firing with propane or LPG: the 2000 Cenicafé bulletin lists direct-fired propane as not recommended by Cenicafé1; a 2022 Cenicafé study found no polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in most coffee dried with direct LPG combustion and concluded that dryers without a heat exchanger could be used if the maker’s operating conditions are followed.5 An Embrapa manual prefers indirect firing to keep smoke odour out of the coffee6, and a 2026 review warns that smoke recirculated from biomass furnaces can give smoky or phenolic notes.4 The 2022 study tested LPG only, not solid fuels.
- Efficiency of drum dryers: a 2026 review gives an overall energy efficiency of 40–60% for optimised rotary and drum dryers against 20–40% for static and cross-flow systems4, while Cenicafé describes the guardiola as having very low thermal efficiency, because its exhaust air still carries much drying capacity.2 The review does not say which drum designs it means.
- Energy per kilogram of water removed: the 2026 review gives about 4,000–5,500 kJ/kg as typical, as a general range from the literature without a cited primary study4, while measurements in two Brazilian heated-air dryers gave about 10,500–14,700 kJ/kg (including fan electricity) and 10,945 kJ/kg.9,10 The measured values come from two Brazilian studies of single dryers, so they may not represent commercial dryers in general.
- Coffee (mass) temperature limit: an Incaper manual sets a maximum of 40 °C in the grain mass with indirect furnaces7, and a Lavras study states, citing earlier work, that mass temperatures above 40 °C cause thermal damage15; an Embrapa manual allows up to 45 °C in the coffee mass, with inlet air up to 80 °C.6 The type-specific limits of a São Paulo state manual (40 °C parchment, 45 °C natural) are given in the drying entry.
Coffearium (2026). Mechanical dryers. Coffearium – The open coffee compendium. Retrieved 22 October 2026, from https://coffearium.org/entries/mechanical-dryers/
@misc{coffearium2026-mechanical-dryers,
author = {{Coffearium}},
title = {{Mechanical dryers}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Coffearium -- The open coffee compendium},
url = {https://coffearium.org/entries/mechanical-dryers/},
urldate = {2026-10-22},
note = {Retrieved 22 October 2026}
}Entries are updated when the evidence changes; the retrieval date tells your readers which version you used. Changes are listed in the Change log.
Change log
- – Removed the temperatures, dew points and cup scores of the dehumidified-air study. Reason: The journal (Research, Society and Development) is now rated Tier B, and a single Tier B source cannot carry a number.
- – The 50 °C air limit is now attributed to Cenicafé's static-layer dryers; the 87 °C air used in a test of its concurrent-flow dryer is added. Reason: Both Cenicafé publications state the 50 °C limit for static layers, and the 2017 handbook tested the concurrent-flow dryer at 87 °C.
- – The silo trial now describes the coffee as pulped and mechanically demucilaged, names the lot moistures (25% to 18%, wet basis) and adds the 19,138 kJ/kg used for heated-air pre-drying before the silo (text and energy chart). Reason: The paper describes the coffee as 'cereja descascado e desmucilado' and reports the pre-drying energy; showing only the silo stage understated the energy of the combined system.
- – The review's 20–40% and 40–60% values are now called overall energy efficiency, not thermal efficiency; its static-bed airflow is up- or down-flow, not only upwards; its 1–2 m columns are identified as cross-flow columns. Reason: Wording of the 2026 review.
- – The Incaper manual is no longer cited for coffee husk as fuel or for loads of equal moisture; it recommends dry eucalyptus or coffee wood and homogeneous lots. Reason: Wording of Incaper Documentos 287.
Sources
- ARoa-Mejía, G.; Oliveros-Tascón, C. E.; Parra-Coronado, A.; Ramírez-G., C. A. (2000). El secado mecánico del café (Avances Técnicos 282). Cenicafé (Colombian Coffee Research Centre). doi:10.38141/10779/0282 · other copies
- AFederación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia; Cenicafé (2017). Optimización operacional de secadores mecánicos para café pergamino. FNC – Cenicafé (ISBN 978-958-8490-19-9).
- AOliveros-Tascón, C. E.; Sanz-Uribe, J. R.; Ramírez-Gómez, C. A.; Peñuela-Martínez, A. E. (2009). Aprovechamiento eficiente de la energía en el secado mecánico del café (Avances Técnicos 380). Cenicafé (Colombian Coffee Research Centre).
- ADuque-Dussán, E.; Figueroa-Varela, P. A.; Cruz-Ospina, V.; Banout, J. (2026). Advances in coffee drying: A comprehensive review of traditional, solar, mechanical, hybrid, and emerging methods. Foods 15(10), 1737. doi:10.3390/foods15101737 · other copies
- AQuintero Yepes, L. V.; Rodríguez Valencia, N.; Ortiz, A. (2022). Efecto del secado con combustión directa de Gas Licuado de Petróleo (GLP) sobre la composición química del grano de café. Revista Cenicafé 73(2), e73204. doi:10.38141/10778/73204 · other copies
- AEmbrapa; Projeto PAS Campo (CNI/SENAI/SEBRAE/Embrapa) (2004). Manual de segurança e qualidade para a cultura do café. Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, Brasília (Série Qualidade e Segurança dos Alimentos).
- AAlixandre, F. T.; Martinuzzo, M. B.; Sousa, D. G.; Krohling, C. A.; Ferrão, M. A. G.; Fonseca, A. A.; Fornazier, M. J.; Verdin Filho, A. C.; De Muner, L. H.; Guarçoni, R. C. (2022). Café arábica: produza o seu especial (Documentos 287). Incaper (Instituto Capixaba de Pesquisa, Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural), Vitória.
- ACodex Alimentarius Commission (FAO/WHO) (2009). Code of Practice for the Prevention and Reduction of Ochratoxin A Contamination in Coffee (CAC/RCP 69-2009). Codex Alimentarius.
- AMartin, S.; Silva, J. N.; Lacerda Filho, A. F.; Queiroz, D. M.; Zanatta, F. L. (2009). Avaliação do desempenho e eficiência energética de um secador para café de fluxos concorrentes e contracorrentes. Engenharia na Agricultura 17(6), 454–461.
- APalacin, J. J. F.; Lacerda Filho, A. F.; Melo, E. C.; Teixeira, E. C. (2009). Secagem combinada de café cereja descascado. Engenharia na Agricultura 17(3), 244–258.
- BSilva, J. S.; Vitor, D. G. (2013). Quando e como utilizar silo secador na cafeicultura. Visão Agrícola 12, 102–105 (ESALQ/USP).
- AIsquierdo, E. P.; Borém, F. M.; Oliveira, P. D.; Siqueira, V. C.; Alves, G. E. (2012). Quality of natural coffee subjected to different rest periods during the drying process. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 36(4), 439–445. doi:10.1590/S1413-70542012000400008 · other copies
- ABorém, F. M.; Isquierdo, E. P.; Oliveira, P. D.; Ribeiro, F. C.; Siqueira, V. C.; Taveira, J. H. S. (2014). Effect of intermittent drying and storage on parchment coffee quality. Bioscience Journal 30(Suppl. 2), 609–616.
- BMoreira, R. V.; Corrêa, J. L. G.; Macedo, L. L.; Araújo, C. S.; Vimercati, W. C.; Souza, A. U.; Petri Júnior, I.; Junqueira, J. R. J. (2021). Sensory quality of parchment coffee subjected to drying at different air temperatures and relative humidities. Research, Society and Development 10(10), e541101019351. doi:10.33448/rsd-v10i10.19351 · other copies
- AAlves, G. E.; Borém, F. M.; Isquierdo, E. P.; Siqueira, V. C.; Cirillo, M. A.; Pinto, A. C. F. (2017). Physiological and sensorial quality of Arabica coffee subjected to different temperatures and drying airflows. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy 39(2), 225–233. doi:10.4025/actasciagron.v39i2.31065 · other copies
Tier A · authoritative · B · trade and expert · C · general. Supporting quotes for every source are in the data version of this entry. If a publisher’s site refuses access, try the doi link or “other copies”.
Discussion
A space for readers to share experience from the farm, the roastery or the bar, ask each other and offer other views. The Coffearium team does not reply here. Please keep to the community rules; to change the entry itself, use Suggest a change.