1. Plant
  2. Farm
  3. Process
  4. Trade
  5. Roast
  6. Brew
  7. Cup
Botany · Genetics

F1 hybrids

First-generation crosses between genetically distant arabica parents, often a cultivated line and a wild Ethiopian accession. They outyield pure lines, but their seed does not breed true, so most are cloned.

Across the chain: Science

Source-checkedby Coffearium verification pass· Last source-checked 22 Oct 2026· Prepared with AI assistance· 13 sources (6 tier A)· 3 contested· Updated 22 Oct 2026
Reading depth
Contents

In brief

  • An arabica F1 hybrid is the first-generation offspring of two genetically distant parents, typically a cultivated line crossed with a wild Ethiopian or Sudanese accession.4,1
  • In 15 Central American trials, F1 hybrids yielded on average 58% more than pure-line cultivars under agroforestry and 34% more in full sun.1
  • Seed from an F1 tree gives a segregating second generation, so most F1 hybrids are cloned by somatic embryogenesis and rooted cuttings.3,4
  • Starmaya is grown from seed; its mother plant makes no pollen, so the seed it bears in a seed garden comes from cross-pollination.3,7
  • A 2018 review gives a sales price of about USD 0.8–1.0 for a cloned F1 plant, against USD 0.3–0.5 for a seed-raised plantlet.4

What an F1 hybrid is#

“F1” stands for the first filial generation: the plants that grow from seed of a cross between two parents. In arabica coffee, breeders cross a cultivated line with a wild tree collected in Ethiopia or Sudan.4,1

The cultivated parent is an American cultivar or a line that carries genes from the Timor Hybrid.1 Centroamericano and Mundo Maya both have T5296, a descendant of the Timor Hybrid, as one parent.6,8 Their other parents are the Sudanese landrace Rume Sudan and the wild Ethiopian accession ET01 from the genebank of CATIE in Costa Rica.6,8 How the F1 group fits among the other lines of arabica is shown in Arabica varieties and their lines.

Why the parents are distant#

Breeders cross wild Ethiopian and Sudanese trees with cultivated lines from the Americas because the two groups are genetically distant.4 In Central America, the first such hybrids considerably widened the genetic diversity of the coffee grown in the region.1 Why cultivated arabica started from so narrow a base is the subject of The arabica bottleneck.

Such hybrids can outyield their parent lines, an effect attributed to hybrid vigour, or heterosis.2,10 In a 2005 trial, hybrid populations yielded 22–47% more than their mother lines.2 In 15 trials in Central America, hybrids also yielded earlier and varied less between harvests than pure lines.1 In a 2017 study with young plants in a climate-controlled room, two F1 hybrids produced fewer leaf rust spores than the inbred line Caturra.13

Why the seed is not replanted#

An F1 tree carries a mixed set of genes from two distant parents. Its own seed comes from self-pollination, and in this second generation (F2) the characteristics segregate: the plants are no longer uniform.3 The breeding system of the species is described in Coffea arabica.

World Coffee Research (WCR) states it plainly in its catalogue: seed taken from hybrid plants will not have the same characteristics as the parent plants.6 Producers therefore buy new hybrid plants from nurseries rather than saving seed.6 Pure-line arabica varieties, by contrast, are propagated by seed.12

Two routes to the field#

There are two ways to plant many uniform F1 plants. One is to clone the best hybrid tree; the other is to produce hybrid seed with a mother plant that makes no pollen.11,3

123456789
  1. Cultivated parent. An American cultivar or a Timor Hybrid-derived line, such as T5296 or Marsellesa.1,6,3
  2. Wild parent. An Ethiopian or Sudanese accession, such as Rume Sudan or ET01.1,6,8
  3. Cross and selection. Hybrids compared in multi-site trials, the best kept.1,5
  4. Somatic embryogenesis. Embryos grown from the selected tree’s tissue in a laboratory.4
  5. Rooted mini-cuttings. Laboratory plantlets used as mother plants in the nursery.4
  6. Field. Plants identical to the selected tree (row of equal filled dots).4
  7. Seed saved from F1 trees. Its offspring segregate (hollow dots of mixed size; dashed arrow: not used for planting).3,6
  8. Seed garden. A mother plant without pollen beside a pollen parent (Starmaya: Marsellesa).3
  9. F1 seed. Harvested from the mother plant every year and sown in the nursery.3,7
The clonal route (1–6) and the seed route (8–9) to a field of F1 plants. Schematic, not to scale.3,4

Cloning. Most F1 hybrids are multiplied as clones. Somatic embryogenesis grows embryos in a laboratory from body cells of the selected tree, not from fertilised seed.4 The plantlets can then serve as mother plants for rooted cuttings in a nursery, which multiplies them further and lowers the cost.4 According to a coffee science textbook, these methods need high skills and suitable laboratories.12

Seed from a mother without pollen. In 2001, researchers found an arabica tree that makes no pollen among Ethiopian trees in the CATIE genebank.3 Such a tree cannot fertilise itself. Planted beside a pollen parent, the seed it sets comes from cross-pollination, ideally by that parent.3 Crossed with the Sarchimor Marsellesa, it gave Starmaya, the first arabica F1 hybrid produced from seed in this way.3,7

Varieties in the F1 group#

Centroamericano was released for producers in Central America.6 In a trial in seven contrasting environments, it and Mundo Maya outperformed the most widely planted American cultivar.5 Starmaya, bred by CIRAD and ECOM, was released by ECOM after field trials in Nicaragua.7

Marsellesa, the pollen parent of Starmaya, is not an F1 hybrid. It is a Sarchimor (Timor Hybrid 832/2 × Villa Sarchi CIFC 971/10), a line selected to the eighth generation (F8).9,3 Ruiru 11 from Kenya, released in 1985 (1986 according to the Starmaya paper), is catalogued as an F1 hybrid of a different kind.10,11,3 Its seed comes from hand-pollinating Catimor mother plants with a multi-cross male selection. Producers receive a mixture of sibling hybrids.10

Yield in the Central American trials#

A comparison published in 2011 ran 15 trials in Costa Rica, El Salvador and Honduras, at 750–1,580 m. Of these, 10 were under agroforestry and 5 in full sun.1 About 20 hybrids from crosses of American cultivars with Ethiopian and Sudanese accessions (ET6, ET15, ET25, E41, E416, E531, Anfilo and Rume Sudan) were grown beside pure-line cultivars such as Caturra, Catuai, Pacas and CR95.1 Yield was recorded over three to seven harvests per trial and expressed in grams of green coffee per tree per year.1

02004006008001000g green coffee per tree per yearHollow: mean of pure-line cultivars · filled: mean of F1 hybridsHonduras, 750 m ·agroforestry450 · 6311 Costa Rica, 800 m ·agroforestry530 · 6131 El Salvador, 820 m ·agroforestry152 · 2501 El Salvador, 880 m ·agroforestry1801 4091 Costa Rica, 1,000 m ·agroforestry4721 7371 El Salvador, 1,060 m ·agroforestry372 · 4121 Honduras, 1,100 m ·agroforestry300 · 3571 El Salvador, 1,260 m ·agroforestry140 · 2431 El Salvador, 1,340 m ·agroforestry146 · 3231 Honduras, 1,420 m ·agroforestry3801 6021 Costa Rica, 1,180 m · fullsun718 · 8901 Costa Rica, 1,185 m · fullsun328 · 4861 Costa Rica, 1,400 m · fullsun3181 6211 Costa Rica, 1,425 m · fullsun794 · 8551 Costa Rica, 1,580 m · fullsun672 · 7291
Data table
Pointg green coffee per tree per yearSource
Honduras, 750 m · agroforestry4504501
Honduras, 750 m · agroforestry6316311
Costa Rica, 800 m · agroforestry5305301
Costa Rica, 800 m · agroforestry6136131
El Salvador, 820 m · agroforestry1521521
El Salvador, 820 m · agroforestry2502501
El Salvador, 880 m · agroforestry1801801
El Salvador, 880 m · agroforestry4094091
Costa Rica, 1,000 m · agroforestry4724721
Costa Rica, 1,000 m · agroforestry7377371
El Salvador, 1,060 m · agroforestry3723721
El Salvador, 1,060 m · agroforestry4124121
Honduras, 1,100 m · agroforestry3003001
Honduras, 1,100 m · agroforestry3573571
El Salvador, 1,260 m · agroforestry1401401
El Salvador, 1,260 m · agroforestry2432431
El Salvador, 1,340 m · agroforestry1461461
El Salvador, 1,340 m · agroforestry3233231
Honduras, 1,420 m · agroforestry3803801
Honduras, 1,420 m · agroforestry6026021
Costa Rica, 1,180 m · full sun7187181
Costa Rica, 1,180 m · full sun8908901
Costa Rica, 1,185 m · full sun3283281
Costa Rica, 1,185 m · full sun4864861
Costa Rica, 1,400 m · full sun3183181
Costa Rica, 1,400 m · full sun6216211
Costa Rica, 1,425 m · full sun7947941
Costa Rica, 1,425 m · full sun8558551
Costa Rica, 1,580 m · full sun6726721
Costa Rica, 1,580 m · full sun7297291
Mean yield of the F1 hybrids and of the pure-line cultivars in each of the 15 trials, in g green coffee per tree per year, averaged over 3–7 harvests. Trials set up in 1999–2001.1

The hybrid mean was above the line mean in every trial, by 8% to 127%; the difference was significant in 14 of the 15 trials.1 Over all trials, the hybrid mean was 460 g against 290 g under agroforestry (+58%) and 754 g against 562 g in full sun (+34%).1 In nine trials, the best hybrid, named Centroamerica in the paper, produced on average about 37% more than the best line of each trial.1 The authors conclude that hybrids could encourage producers who had moved to full sun to return to agroforestry.1

Stability and earliness also favoured the hybrids. The coefficient of variation of yield ranged from 29% to 70% for hybrids and from 46% to 94% for lines; the difference was significant at eight sites.1 The hybrids’ earlier yields were statistically significant in nine of the 15 trials.1

A later trial in seven contrasting environments compared new F1 clones with conventional varieties. The conventional varieties were the least productive, producing 50% less than the best hybrid.5 For Starmaya, a multi-site trial in Nicaragua found 30% more coffee per plant than Caturra and Marsellesa. In a commercial field at Matagalpa, Starmaya averaged 41.1 bags (46 kg) of green coffee per hectare over three harvests (2015–2018), against 30.4 for Marsellesa.3

Cup quality and other traits#

The 2011 paper reports earlier sensory evaluations in which the hybrids performed as well as or better than the traditional lines.1 In the 2020 trial, H1-Centroamericano and Starmaya contained more d-limonene than Caturra, and both scored better than the control in sensory analysis.5 These are results of named trials, not general properties of F1 hybrids.

Heterosis has a cost in fertility. The 2005 study found the hybrids significantly more sterile than their parental lines.2 Selection on an index of yield, bean weight and fertility improved yield and bean weight, but the gain in fertility was not significant.2 Rust resistance depends on the parents: in Starmaya, field observations found 8% of plants susceptible to leaf rust, against 1% in Marsellesa.3

Hybrids and leaf rust in a controlled study#

A 2017 study tested whether hybrid vigour affects leaf rust in arabica that carries no specific resistance. It compared the inbred line Caturra with two F1 hybrids, GPFA 109 and GPFA 124. All three are susceptible, and the hybrids were not expected to carry specific resistance to prevalent races.13 Six-month-old potted plants were grown in a phytotron, a climate-controlled growth room, under eight treatments.13 These combined two day/night temperature regimes (27–22 °C and 23–18 °C), two light levels and two nitrogen doses.13 The light levels, 300 and 1,000 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹ of photosynthetically active radiation, were meant to mimic agroforestry and full sun.13 The nitrogen doses totalled 134 and 266 mg per plant over 11 weeks.13 Four plants per treatment were inoculated with a mixture of rust spores collected in Colombia.13

Sporulation was measured as the weight of spores per infected leaf area, 43 days after inoculation.13 Under the warmer regime, it was significantly lower in the hybrids than in Caturra in all four combinations of light and nitrogen. Under the cooler regime, the difference was significant only with high light and low nitrogen.13 The paper reports slower infection in the hybrids in every treatment, although with the warmer regime and high light the course in GPFA 109 was very similar to that in Caturra.13 With the warmer regime, low light and low nitrogen, the latent period lasted about 21 days in Caturra and 37 days in the hybrids.13 The authors suggest that hybrid vigour may have reduced disease incidence.13

Temperature, light and nitrogen also changed sporulation. In Caturra, the warmer regime gave about 2,000 times more sporulation than the cooler one according to the abstract; the results section gives 10,000 times more spores per infected leaf area.13 In Caturra, high light with low nitrogen gave significantly more spores than the other treatments under both regimes.13 Under shade and sufficient nitrogen, rust incidence on the hybrids was very low.13 These results come from young plants, two hybrids and one line in controlled conditions. For the field, the authors cite only their own unpublished preliminary observations that susceptible F1 hybrids are less severely attacked than pure lines.13

Somatic embryogenesis and rooted cuttings#

In the coffee process described in a 2018 review, the whole mass-propagation cycle takes about 24 months.4 Embryos are multiplied in liquid culture, at 15,000–50,000 somatic embryos per gram of embryogenic suspension depending on the genotype, and pre-germinated in temporary immersion culture.4 Acclimatisation in the nursery took 20–30 weeks in the 2010 process.4

Cloning in culture can introduce mutations (somaclonal variation). The review reports rates of about 1.3%, and 0.9% in a sample of 800,000 plants; adjusted protocols brought it below 0.5%, with over 99% of trees conforming to the mother plant.4 Horticultural rooted mini-cuttings taken from the laboratory plantlets multiplied each plant 14 times in six months and halved the production cost.4

According to a coffee science textbook, cuttings of upright shoots grown on mother plants have been used on a large scale in Central America to propagate arabica hybrids.12 Since 1997, producers across Central America have had access to some F1 hybrid clones.1 As of 2018, more than 20 million arabica hybrid plants had been planted in the region.4

Male sterility and seed purity#

The pollen-free tree, CIR-SM01, is a natural mutant with a tall growth habit.3 Its sterility comes from a malfunction of the tapetum, the tissue that feeds developing pollen, at an early stage.3 The trait is recessive: in four F2 populations with 1,250 plants, 18.3% were sterile, which the authors suggest may reflect a two-gene (epistatic) 9:4:3 ratio.3 The sterility was complete and stable across environments and plant ages.3

Seed gardens rely on natural pollination by the pollen parent.3 Purity was the weak point. In 2016 fields, a mean of 16% of Starmaya plants were off-types, against 3% for Marsellesa.3 The authors trace this to stray pollen and to residual heterozygosity in both parents, and aimed for at most 5% off-types with fixed parents, windbreaks and insect-proof netting.3

The method limits the number of hybrids that can be made by seed to the number of available male-sterile plants.3 Ruiru 11 shows the older seed route: hand pollination. WCR notes that this has made Ruiru 11 seed hard to supply in sufficient volume.10

Reference values#

Parameter Value Basis
Yield gain, hybrids over pure lines +58% (agroforestry), +34% (full sun)1 15 trials, Central America, 2000–2006
Yield gain, hybrid populations over mother lines 22–47%2 Two sites, 2005 study
Yield gain, review figure 30–60%4 2018 review
Starmaya vs Marsellesa, commercial field 41.1 vs 30.4 bags green coffee/ha3 Matagalpa, Nicaragua, 2015–2018
Somatic embryos per gram of suspension 15,000–50,0004 Depends on genotype
Mass-propagation cycle ≈24 months4 Somatic embryogenesis process
Rooted mini-cutting multiplication 14 in 6 months4 From laboratory plantlets
Somaclonal variation ≈1.3%; below 0.5% with adjusted protocols4 Commercial production
Sterile plants in F2 of CIR-SM01 18.3%3 4 populations, 1,250 plants
Off-types in Starmaya fields 16% (Marsellesa 3%)3 300 plants per cultivar, 2016

Cost and access#

Cloned plants cost more than seedlings. In 2011, the extra cost per tree was USD 0.5–0.6, an investment of USD 2,500–3,000 per hectare.1 According to the 2018 review, adding rooted mini-cuttings cut the production cost from USD 0.50–0.60 to 0.25–0.30 per plant.4 The same review gives a sales price of about USD 0.8–1.0 for a cloned F1 plant against USD 0.3–0.5 for a seed-derived plantlet, and expects the extra cost to be repaid after three to four harvests.4

Item Cost (USD, year of source)
Extra cost per cloned tree 0.5–0.6 (2011)1
Plant from somatic embryogenesis, production 0.50–0.60 (2018)4; ≈0.60 (2019)3
Plus rooted mini-cuttings, production 0.25–0.30 (2018)4; ≈0.27 (2019)3
Cloned F1 plant, sales price 0.8–1.0 (2018)4
Seed-derived plantlet, sales price 0.3–0.5 (2018)4
Starmaya seed, per seed ≈0.07 (2019)3

Even with mini-cuttings, a cloned hybrid cost about 1.5 times as much as a traditional seedling in 2019.3 The Starmaya authors estimated a hybrid seed at about USD 0.07, half the price of a cloned plantlet.3 According to a coffee science textbook, F1 varieties need vegetative propagation, which raises plantlet costs, and plantlet cost remains a barrier to wider use of in vitro methods.11,12 According to WCR, only a handful of F1 hybrids had become commercially available to producers, and only in select countries.6

Open questions#

  • Seed purity at scale. Whether seed gardens can keep off-types at or below the 5% the Starmaya authors set as commercially acceptable is not yet shown in a published field study opened for this entry.3
  • More male-sterile mothers. Seed-propagated hybrids are limited to crosses with the male-sterile plants available.3
  • Performance outside Central America. Starmaya was introduced to Vietnam and Cameroon for comparison with local varieties; no results were published in the sources opened for this entry.3
  • Rust on F1 hybrids in the field. The lower sporulation of two hybrids was shown in young plants in a phytotron; the authors’ field evidence is unpublished preliminary observation.13

Key studies#

Bertrand et al., 2011 – Hybrids under shade and in full sun. Compared about 20 F1 hybrids from wild Ethiopian and Sudanese parents with pure-line cultivars in 15 trials in Costa Rica, El Salvador and Honduras. The hybrids gave higher, earlier and steadier yields, with the largest advantage under agroforestry.

Euphytica 181(2), 147–158 · doi:10.1007/s10681-011-0372-7

Bertrand et al., 2005 – Yield, fertility and bean weight. Tested hybrids of Latin American cultivars and wild Sudan-Ethiopian trees at two sites. Hybrid populations out-yielded their mother lines but were more sterile, and index selection raised yield and bean weight.

Euphytica 141(3), 255–262 · doi:10.1007/s10681-005-7681-7

Etienne et al., 2018 – Cloning coffee at commercial scale. Reviews three decades of somatic embryogenesis in coffee, from bioreactors to rooted mini-cuttings. Reports production volumes, costs and the low rate of off-type plants in Central American F1 hybrid propagation.

Frontiers in Plant Science 9, 1630 · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01630

Georget et al., 2019 – Starmaya. Describes the pollen-free arabica mutant, its inheritance and the seed gardens that use it to produce F1 seed. Reports yields, off-type rates and costs against cloned plants.

Frontiers in Plant Science 10, 1344 · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01344

Marie et al., 2020 – Hybrids across environments. Compared new F1 clones with conventional varieties in seven contrasting environments, for yield, rust, bean traits, aroma compounds and sensory scores. Two hybrids, Centroamericano and Mundo Maya, outperformed the most planted American cultivar.

Euphytica 216(5), 78 · doi:10.1007/s10681-020-02608-8

Toniutti et al., 2017 – Hybrids, environment and leaf rust. Grew the inbred line Caturra and two susceptible F1 hybrids in a phytotron under two temperature regimes, two light levels and two nitrogen doses, then inoculated them with leaf rust. The hybrids were infected more slowly and produced fewer spores, most clearly under the warmer regime.

Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 2025 · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.02025

Contested
  • Size of the yield gain: a 2005 trial found hybrid populations yielding 22–47% more than their maternal lines2; 15 trials published in 2011 found 58% more under agroforestry and 34% more in full sun, compared with pure-line cultivars1; a 2018 review gives 30–60%.4 The figures differ mainly in what the hybrids are compared with.
  • Release year of Ruiru 11: 1985 according to the WCR catalogue and a coffee science textbook10,11; 1986 according to the Starmaya paper.3
  • Annual output of cloned F1 plants in Nicaragua: a 2018 review gives 2–3 million plants per year4; a 2019 paper by an overlapping group of authors gives an average of 1 million per year.3 Neither states the years averaged.
Share or cite this entry

Change log

  • – The 2011 trials now say the hybrid mean exceeded the line mean in every trial and that the difference was significant in 14 of the 15; hybrids are said to outyield their parent lines (not both parents). Reason: Bertrand et al. 2011, Table 3, marks one trial (Honduras, 1,100 m) as not significant; Bertrand et al. 2005 compares hybrids with the maternal lines only.
  • – Release year of Centroamericano (2010) removed; Ruiru 11 release given as 1985 with the 1986 of the Starmaya paper, and listed under contested; WCR's figure of about 15% segregating Starmaya plants removed. Reason: WCR catalogue pages are Tier B outside its own trials, so a year or share resting on WCR alone does not meet the number rule; Georget et al. 2019 gives 1986 for Ruiru 11.
  • – Seed from a male-sterile mother is described as coming from cross-pollination, ideally by the pollen parent, not as being hybrid in every case; "pollinated by hand" removed from the figure legend; the 2018 plant prices are attributed to the review rather than dated to 2018. Reason: Georget et al. 2019 reports 16% off-types from stray pollen and residual heterozygosity; no opened source says the F1 crosses were made by hand; Etienne et al. 2018 gives no year for the prices.

Sources

  1. ABertrand, B.; Alpizar, E.; Lara, L.; SantaCreo, R.; Hidalgo, M.; Quijano, J. M.; Montagnon, C.; Georget, F.; Etienne, H. (2011). Performance of Coffea arabica F1 hybrids in agroforestry and full-sun cropping systems in comparison with American pure line cultivars. Euphytica 181(2), 147–158. doi:10.1007/s10681-011-0372-7 · other copies
  2. ABertrand, B.; Etienne, H.; Cilas, C.; Charrier, A.; Baradat, P. (2005). Coffea arabica hybrid performance for yield, fertility and bean weight. Euphytica 141(3), 255–262. doi:10.1007/s10681-005-7681-7 · other copies
  3. AGeorget, F.; Marie, L.; Alpizar, E.; Courtel, P.; Bordeaux, M.; Hidalgo, J. M.; Marraccini, P.; Breitler, J.-C.; Déchamp, E.; Poncon, C.; Etienne, H.; Bertrand, B. (2019). Starmaya: The First Arabica F1 Coffee Hybrid Produced Using Genetic Male Sterility. Frontiers in Plant Science 10, 1344. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01344 · other copies
  4. AEtienne, H.; Breton, D.; Breitler, J.-C.; Bertrand, B.; Déchamp, E.; Awada, R.; Marraccini, P.; Léran, S.; Alpizar, E.; Campa, C.; Courtel, P.; Georget, F.; Ducos, J.-P. (2018). Coffee Somatic Embryogenesis: How Did Research, Experience Gained and Innovations Promote the Commercial Propagation of Elite Clones From the Two Cultivated Species?. Frontiers in Plant Science 9, 1630. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01630 · other copies
  5. AMarie, L.; Abdallah, C.; Campa, C.; Courtel, P.; Bordeaux, M.; Navarini, L.; Lonzarich, V.; Bosselmann, A. S.; Turreira-Garcia, N.; Alpizar, E.; Georget, F.; Breitler, J.-C.; Etienne, H.; Bertrand, B. (2020). G x E interactions on yield and quality in Coffea arabica: new F1 hybrids outperform American cultivars. Euphytica 216(5), 78. doi:10.1007/s10681-020-02608-8 · other copies
  6. BWorld Coffee Research Centroamericano. World Coffee Research, Arabica Coffee Varieties catalogue.
  7. BWorld Coffee Research Starmaya. World Coffee Research, Arabica Coffee Varieties catalogue.
  8. BWorld Coffee Research Mundo Maya. World Coffee Research, Arabica Coffee Varieties catalogue.
  9. BWorld Coffee Research Marsellesa. World Coffee Research, Arabica Coffee Varieties catalogue.
  10. BWorld Coffee Research Ruiru 11. World Coffee Research, Arabica Coffee Varieties catalogue.
  11. BHerrera, J. C.; Lambot, C. (2017). The Coffee Tree – Genetic Diversity and Origin. In: Folmer, B. (ed.), The Craft and Science of Coffee, Academic Press, ch. 1, pp. 1–16. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-803520-7.00001-3 · other copies
  12. BLambot, C.; Herrera, J. C.; Bertrand, B.; Sadeghian, S.; Benavides, P.; Gaitán, A. (2017). Cultivating Coffee Quality – Terroir and Agro-Ecosystem. In: Folmer, B. (ed.), The Craft and Science of Coffee, Academic Press, ch. 2, pp. 17–49. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-803520-7.00002-5 · other copies
  13. AToniutti, L.; Breitler, J. C.; Etienne, H.; Campa, C.; Doulbeau, S.; Urban, L.; Lambot, C.; Pinilla, J. C. H.; Bertrand, B. (2017). Influence of environmental conditions and genetic background of Arabica coffee (C. arabica L) on leaf rust (Hemileia vastatrix) pathogenesis. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 2025. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.02025 · other copies

Tier A · authoritative · B · trade and expert · C · general. Supporting quotes for every source are in the data version of this entry. If a publisher’s site refuses access, try the doi link or “other copies”.

Suggest a change

On F1 hybrids. Tell us what you would change and why. A source that supports it helps most.