CoffeariumBeta
  1. Plant
  2. Farm
  3. Process
  4. Trade
  5. Roast
  6. Brew
  7. Cup
Roasting · Chemistry

Strecker degradation

A branch of the Maillard network in which amino acids react with sugar-derived dicarbonyls during roasting, giving malty, potato-like and honey-like aldehydes, carbon dioxide and building blocks for pyrazines.

Across the chain: Science

Source-checkedby Coffearium verification pass· Last source-checked 20 Oct 2026· Prepared with AI assistance· 17 sources (12 tier A)· Updated 20 Oct 2026
Reading depth
Contents
  • In Strecker degradation, an α-amino acid reacts with an α-dicarbonyl from sugar breakdown and becomes an aldehyde with one carbon fewer, releasing carbon dioxide.2,4
  • Its key aldehydes in coffee are malty 2- and 3-methylbutanal, potato-like methional and honey-like phenylacetaldehyde.1,11
  • Free amino acids, its starting material, are almost completely used up in roasting.1
  • Strecker degradation is one of the reactions named as sources of carbon dioxide and reaction water in roasting.16,17
  • Strecker aldehydes peak at a medium roast degree and are lost quickly after grinding and in storage.13,15,16

What Strecker degradation is#

Strecker degradation is a reaction between amino acids and reactive fragments of sugars. It runs inside the Maillard reaction network during roasting.1 The amino acid loses its amino group and its carboxyl group. What remains is an aldehyde with one carbon fewer than the amino acid, and carbon dioxide is released.1,2

The sugar fragments that start the reaction are α-dicarbonyls: small molecules with two neighbouring carbonyl groups. They form when sugars break down, and they drive the formation of the so-called Strecker aldehydes from amino acids.4 In the classic 1953 scheme of browning, the dicarbonyl takes up the nitrogen and becomes an amino compound, an α-aminoketone.2

A coffee chemistry textbook chapter calls Strecker degradation of outstanding importance for coffee flavour.1 According to the chapter, it gives malty, potato-like and honey-like aldehydes, and it also yields the earthy, roasty alkylpyrazines.1

1Free amino acidR′–CH(NH₂)–COOH 2 2α-DicarbonylFrom sugar breakdownin the Maillard network 4 3Strecker degradationDeamination anddecarboxylation 1,2 4Strecker aldehydeR′–CHO, one carbon fewer 2 5Carbon dioxideFrom the carboxylgroup 2 6α-AminoketoneThe dicarbonyl takesup the nitrogen 2 7AlkylpyrazinesEarthy, roasty; proposedvia dihydropyrazines 1,5 Amino acid → Strecker aldehyde · odourLeucine→3-methylbutanalmalty 6,1 Isoleucine→2-methylbutanalmalty 6,1 Methionine→methionalpotato 7,1 Phenylalanine→phenylacetaldehydehoney 4,1 Schematic, not to scale. Strecker aldehydes can also form from Amadori products 3,4 and withdiphenols in model systems 8 ; the dashed route to pyrazines is proposed from model studies.
Strecker degradation: an amino acid and a sugar-derived α-dicarbonyl give an aldehyde with one carbon fewer, carbon dioxide and an α-aminoketone; Strecker degradation also yields alkylpyrazines, by routes proposed from model studies (dashed). The four amino acid–aldehyde pairs listed are those named in the sources.1,2,4,5,6,7 Schematic, not to scale.

The aldehydes it makes#

Each amino acid gives its own aldehyde. The aldehyde keeps the side chain of the amino acid, so its smell depends on which amino acid reacted.2 The Strecker aldehydes that matter most for coffee aroma are:1,11

  • 3-Methylbutanal, from leucine – malty.6,1
  • 2-Methylbutanal, from isoleucine – malty, with a green note.6,1
  • Methylpropanal – fruity and malty.11
  • Methional, from methionine – boiled potato.7,11
  • Phenylacetaldehyde, from phenylalanine – honey-like.4,1

None of these smells like coffee on its own. They are part of the balance of key odorants that together make up coffee aroma.1 Methional, for example, was among the most intense odorants of a filtered coffee brew in a 2002 study.10

Where the amino acids come from#

The starting material is the small pool of free amino acids in green coffee. According to the roasting chemistry chapter, they make up only a small share of the bean, yet they are key partners of both the Maillard reaction and Strecker degradation.1 Almost all of them are used up during roasting.1

The species differ. Robusta green coffee holds more free amino acids than arabica.1 According to the chapter, arabica’s slightly lower isoleucine and leucine give less 2- and 3-methylbutanal after roasting.1 The same chapter lists methional as more abundant in arabica and 2-methylbutanal as more abundant in robusta.1

Strecker aldehydes during and after the roast#

During the roast. Strecker aldehydes form early. Their amounts rise fast in the first stages of roasting, peak at a medium roast degree and then fall as degradation overtakes formation.13,12 In a 2020 study at one roast colour, a longer development time lowered the honey-like phenylacetaldehyde in the brew.14

Carbon dioxide. Each amino acid that reacts releases one molecule of carbon dioxide.2 A Specialty Coffee Association (SCA) handbook names Strecker degradation and pyrolysis as the two reactions that form carbon dioxide in roasting.16 A 2005 roasting study lists it among several sources of carbon dioxide and reaction water.17 The separate entry on roast gases and carbon dioxide covers the gas as a whole.

After the roast. Strecker aldehydes are volatile and reactive. A textbook chapter on freshness reports that 2- and 3-methylbutanal and methylpropanal fell sharply in the headspace shortly after grinding.15 The SCA handbook names Strecker aldehydes among the freshness markers that are lost quickly.16

Mechanism#

The classic equation. Hodge’s 1953 review describes Strecker degradation as the breakdown of α-amino acids by dicarbonyl compounds into aldehydes with one carbon less, with the liberation of carbon dioxide.2 It places the reaction in the intermediate stage of browning, after fission or dehydration of the sugar.2 The review writes the total reaction as RCOCOR + R′CH(NH₂)COOH → R′CHO + CO₂ + RCH(NH₂)COR. The dicarbonyl is transaminated to an α-aminoketone.2 Hodge notes that this transamination could be an important route for nitrogen into the brown polymer.2 Compounds that turn easily into such dicarbonyl structures, such as reductones, also react.2

In coffee. According to the roasting chemistry chapter, the reaction is a deamination and oxidative decarboxylation of the amino acid.1 A 2008 doctoral thesis on coffee roasting notes that methylpropanal and 2- and 3-methylbutanal are regarded as products of decarboxylative transamination. In this view, water is added, and the adduct breaks down into aminoacetone and the Strecker aldehyde.13

Other routes to the same aldehydes. Free amino acids are not the only source. A 2003 review states that Strecker aldehydes can form directly from free amino acids or from Amadori products, and that several mechanisms have been proposed.3 In a 2000 model study, the Amadori compound of phenylalanine was a much more effective precursor of phenylacetaldehyde than phenylalanine with glucose.4 The authors traced this to a metal-catalysed oxidation by air of the Amadori compound.4 Other carbonyl compounds can stand in for the dicarbonyl. In a 2011 model study, carbonyls from oxidised proteins raised 3-methylbutanal from leucine and 2-methylbutanal from isoleucine.6 In a 2015 model study, phenols with two hydroxyl groups in ortho or para position degraded amino acids in the same way, without added oxidants.8

Towards pyrazines. According to the roasting chemistry chapter, Strecker degradation also yields alkylpyrazines.1 The 2003 review describes 2-aminocarbonyl compounds, the aminoketones of the classic equation, as products of the reaction alongside the aldehydes.3 In a 1995 labelling study of glucose and fructose heated with alanine and glycine at 180 °C, the amino acids supplied both nitrogen and parts of the side chains of alkylpyrazines.5 The proposed routes add the Strecker aldehydes of alanine and glycine to dihydropyrazines, postulated as intermediates.5 No source opened for this entry shows directly how the aminoketones themselves enter the pyrazine ring.

Sulphur products. Methional is not an end point. A freshness chapter describes methanethiol as a known degradation product of methionine or of its Strecker product methional.15 The 2008 thesis names methanethiol as a product of Strecker degradation and β-elimination of methionine, and a possible precursor of sulphides.13

Concentration and odour impact#

Strecker aldehydes occur in coffee at very different concentrations. A 2001 model study rebuilt the aroma of a coffee brew from 25 odorants, at the concentrations determined in an earlier study of a brew.9 In that set, 2-methylbutanal was present at 87 µg, methylpropanal at 76 µg and 3-methylbutanal at 57 µg per 100 mL, but methional at only 1.0 µg per 100 mL.9

020406080100µg per 100 mL2-Methylbutanal879 Methylpropanal769 3-Methylbutanal579 Methional1.09
Data table
µg per 100 mLSource
2-Methylbutanal879
Methylpropanal769
3-Methylbutanal579
Methional1.09
Concentrations of four Strecker aldehydes in a coffee brew, as used to rebuild brew aroma in a 2001 model study (its Table 1, with values taken from a 2000 study of the brew). One brew; µg per 100 mL.9

Concentration does not rank odour impact. Methional, the least concentrated of the four, was among the most intense odorants of a filtered brew in a 2002 aroma extract dilution study.10 A brewing chapter explains that the response to an odorant follows a sigmoid curve that differs from compound to compound. For that reason, the balance of compounds must be considered at least as much as each concentration on its own.11 The same chapter rates methional higher in sensory significance in the brew than in the powder.11 The 2008 thesis summarises earlier omission experiments, in which methylpropanal and 2- and 3-methylbutanal were among the odorants with the highest impact on coffee aroma.13

In the 2001 study, melanoidins added to the model reduced the sulphury, roasty note and three thiols in the headspace, but the aldehydes remained unaffected.9

Roast conditions#

Time and temperature at one colour. One study roasted a washed Sumatran arabica to the same lightness (L* 21) in four ways: a 20 kg production drum and three laboratory fluid-bed programmes.12,13 Formation of the three Strecker aldehydes early in the roast seemed slightly favoured by high temperature. At L* 21, high-temperature short-time roasting gave significantly more 2- and 3-methylbutanal than the long-time roasts, with one exception for 2-methylbutanal.12,13

051015202530mg/kg dry matterMethylpropanal · HTST23.112,13 Methylpropanal · LTLT20.212,13 Methylpropanal · Drum14.012,13 2-Methylbutanal · HTST24.412,13 2-Methylbutanal · Profile21.712,13 2-Methylbutanal · Drum19.212,13 2-Methylbutanal · LTLT18.712,13 3-Methylbutanal · HTST18.912,13 3-Methylbutanal · Profile12.112,13 3-Methylbutanal · Drum11.712,13 3-Methylbutanal · LTLT11.312,13
Data table
mg/kg dry matterSource
Methylpropanal · HTST23.112, 13
Methylpropanal · LTLT20.212, 13
Methylpropanal · Drum14.012, 13
2-Methylbutanal · HTST24.412, 13
2-Methylbutanal · Profile21.712, 13
2-Methylbutanal · Drum19.212, 13
2-Methylbutanal · LTLT18.712, 13
3-Methylbutanal · HTST18.912, 13
3-Methylbutanal · Profile12.112, 13
3-Methylbutanal · Drum11.712, 13
3-Methylbutanal · LTLT11.312, 13
Strecker aldehydes in roasted coffee after four time–temperature programmes to the same lightness (L* 21); one washed arabica from Sumatra; mean, mg/kg dry matter. HTST: fluid bed, 260 °C, 160 s; LTLT: fluid bed, 228 °C, 660 s; Profile: fluid bed, 180→232 °C, 900 s; Drum: 20 kg, 1170 s. Methylpropanal was not available for the profile roast.12,13

Over-roasting. When the profile roast was extended to 40 min, the three Strecker aldehydes were degraded, but their decrease seemed to level off.12,13 After 40 min, 2-methylbutanal stood at 4.6 mg/kg and 3-methylbutanal at 3.3 mg/kg dry matter (one roast), against 21.7 and 12.1 mg/kg at L* 21.12,13 The published study reports that excessive roasting generally led to falling or stable amounts of volatiles.12

Development time. A 2020 study roasted one Colombian coffee on a 1 kg drum to Agtron 76 with development times of 90, 143, 266 and 390 s. Phenylacetaldehyde (benzeneacetaldehyde) in the brew headspace fell from 48 to 28 (mean relative peak area).14

Precursor changes before roasting. In the 2008 thesis, steam-treated green coffee gave significantly less 2-methylbutanal than untreated coffee.13 The thesis cites earlier work that linked low Strecker aldehydes to the loss of free amino acids when green coffee was extracted with hot water.13 Green coffee with less initial moisture gave less methylpropanal and 3-methylbutanal after light roasting; in dark roasts the differences were small and mostly not significant.13

Timing in the roast. The roasting chemistry chapter shows a heat map of an isothermal drum roast. In it, the malty Strecker aldehydes formed within the first minutes, at about the same time as the earthy pyrazines.1

Carbon dioxide from Strecker degradation#

The classic equation releases one carbon dioxide per amino acid degraded.2 Hodge’s review reports earlier tracer work in which over 80% of the carbon dioxide generated from glucose and glycine came from the carboxyl group of the amino acid.2 It also reports that aldehyde production paralleled carbon dioxide release in sugar–amino acid browning.2

For coffee, the SCA handbook describes Strecker degradation as running in parallel with the Maillard reaction and turning amino acids into aldehydes, with carbon dioxide as a by-product.16 According to the handbook, the Maillard reaction contributes most of the carbon dioxide formed early in the roast, up to and around first crack, and pyrolysis forms carbon dioxide only in darker roasts.16 The 2005 study names Strecker degradation, decarboxylation of amino acids, the Maillard reaction and the breakdown of chlorogenic acids and sucrose as sources of carbon dioxide and reaction water.17 No source opened for this entry measured the share of roast carbon dioxide that comes from Strecker degradation.

Stability and staling#

According to the 2008 thesis, an earlier two-phase model of staling saw aroma freshness as carried mainly by a few low-boiling odorants: sulphur compounds, Strecker aldehydes and α-diketones.13 The freshness chapter reports a study in which methylpropanal and 2- and 3-methylbutanal dropped sharply in the headspace of ground coffee shortly after grinding.15

Moisture speeds up their loss. In the thesis, 2- and 3-methylbutanal, 2-furfurylthiol and the α-diketones were lost considerably faster in roast and ground coffee with more water.13 The differences showed under protective atmosphere; in normal air, fast oxidation was assumed to mask them.13 The author suggests that water may explain this by lowering the glass transition temperature, which speeds up reactions in the solid.13 The thesis also cites work showing that the loss of 3-methylbutanal was at least partly not oxygen-related.13

Reference values#

The values below are those reported in the sources. They describe one coffee, brew or study each; they are not targets.

Parameter Value reported Source
Carbon loss Aldehyde has one carbon fewer than the amino acid Hodge2
CO₂ from the amino acid carboxyl (glucose–glycine model) Over 80% of the CO₂ formed Hodge2
Parent amino acids named in the sources Leucine → 3-methylbutanal; isoleucine → 2-methylbutanal; methionine → methional; phenylalanine → phenylacetaldehyde Estévez et al.6, Krax et al.7, Hofmann & Schieberle4
Odour qualities 3-Methylbutanal malty, cocoa; 2-methylbutanal green, solvent, malty; methylpropanal fruity, malty; methional potato; phenylacetaldehyde honey-like Poisson et al.1, Mestdagh et al.11
More abundant in (roasted) 2-Methylbutanal: robusta; 3-methylbutanal: similar; methional: arabica Poisson et al.1
Concentrations in one brew (µg per 100 mL) 2-Methylbutanal 87; methylpropanal 76; 3-methylbutanal 57; methional 1.0 Hofmann et al.9
Roasted coffee at L* 21, mg/kg dry matter (HTST · LTLT · profile · drum) Methylpropanal 23.1 · 20.2 · n.a. · 14.0; 2-methylbutanal 24.4 · 18.7 · 21.7 · 19.2; 3-methylbutanal 18.9 · 11.3 · 12.1 · 11.7 Baggenstoss et al.12,13
After 40 min profile roast (n = 1), mg/kg dry matter Methylpropanal 8.5; 2-methylbutanal 4.6; 3-methylbutanal 3.3 Baggenstoss et al.12,13
Phenylacetaldehyde in brew headspace, development 90 · 143 · 266 · 390 s at Agtron 76 (mean relative peak area) 48 · 41 · 32 · 28 Alstrup et al.14
Pyrazine labelling model Glucose or fructose with labelled alanine and glycine, 7 min at 180 °C Amrani-Hemaimi et al.5

Open questions#

  • Share of each route in the bean. Model studies show Strecker aldehydes forming from free amino acids, Amadori products, protein carbonyls and diphenols.3,4,6,8 No source opened for this entry measured how much each route contributes inside a roasting coffee bean.
  • Chlorogenic acid–derived phenols. The 2015 diphenol study used model systems and did not test coffee.8 Whether phenols formed from chlorogenic acids drive Strecker-type reactions in roasting coffee is not established by the sources opened.
  • Model systems versus the bean. The 2008 thesis warns that reactions in whole beans, under pressure and in cellular compartments, differ from those in aqueous models.13
  • Carbon dioxide share. How much of the carbon dioxide formed in a roast comes from Strecker degradation is not quantified in the sources opened.16,17
  • Generality of roast effects. The time–temperature and development-time results each come from one coffee.13,14

Key studies#

Hodge, 1953 – Chemistry of browning reactions. Places Strecker degradation in the intermediate stage of the browning scheme. Gives the overall equation, in which a dicarbonyl turns an amino acid into an aldehyde with one carbon less, carbon dioxide and an aminoketone, and collects early evidence that aldehyde formation parallels carbon dioxide release.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1(15), 928–943 · doi:10.1021/jf60015a004

Amrani-Hemaimi et al., 1995 – How alkylpyrazines form. Heated glucose and fructose with carbon-13-labelled alanine and glycine for 7 min at 180 °C. The amino acids supplied nitrogen and parts of the alkyl side chains, through Strecker aldehydes adding to dihydropyrazine intermediates.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 43(11), 2818–2822 · doi:10.1021/jf00059a009

Hofmann & Schieberle, 2000 – Strecker aldehydes from Amadori compounds. Compared phenylacetaldehyde formed from phenylalanine with glucose and from the corresponding Amadori compound. The Amadori compound was much more effective, through a metal-catalysed oxidation by air oxygen, which may explain varying ratios of Strecker aldehydes and acids.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 48(9), 4301–4305 · doi:10.1021/jf000076e

Hofmann et al., 2001 – Melanoidins and brew aroma. Rebuilt the aroma of a coffee brew from 25 odorants at measured brew concentrations, then added coffee melanoidins. Thiols such as 2-furfurylthiol dropped in the headspace and the sulphury-roasty note weakened, while the aldehydes were unaffected.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 49(5), 2382–2386 · doi:10.1021/jf0012042

Baggenstoss et al., 2008 – Time–temperature conditions and aroma. Roasted one arabica to the same lightness in a production drum and in three fluid-bed programmes. Fast, hot roasting gave more 2- and 3-methylbutanal at the same colour; in over-roasting, Strecker aldehydes fell and then levelled off.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56(14), 5836–5846 · doi:10.1021/jf800327j

Share or cite this entry

Change log

  • – The reaction diagram and its caption no longer show alkylpyrazines forming from the α-aminoketone; the dashed route now starts at the reaction as a whole, and the text says no opened source shows how aminoketones enter the pyrazine ring. Reason: The sources say that Strecker degradation yields alkylpyrazines and that Strecker aldehydes add to postulated dihydropyrazine intermediates, not that the aminoketone forms them.
  • – Brief now says Strecker aldehydes are lost quickly after grinding and in storage, instead of among the first odorants lost. Reason: The sources describe a quick loss, not a ranking against other odorants.

Sources

  1. BPoisson, L.; Blank, I.; Dunkel, A.; Hofmann, T. (2017). The Chemistry of Roasting – Decoding Flavor Formation. In: Folmer, B. (ed.), The Craft and Science of Coffee, Academic Press, ch. 12, pp. 273–309. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-803520-7.00012-8 · other copies
  2. AHodge, J. E. (1953). Dehydrated Foods, Chemistry of Browning Reactions in Model Systems. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1(15), 928–943. doi:10.1021/jf60015a004 · other copies
  3. AYaylayan, V. A. (2003). Recent Advances in the Chemistry of Strecker Degradation and Amadori Rearrangement: Implications to Aroma and Color Formation. Food Science and Technology Research 9(1), 1–6. doi:10.3136/fstr.9.1 · other copies
  4. AHofmann, T.; Schieberle, P. (2000). Formation of aroma-active Strecker-aldehydes by a direct oxidative degradation of Amadori compounds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 48(9), 4301–4305. doi:10.1021/jf000076e · other copies
  5. AAmrani-Hemaimi, M.; Cerny, C.; Fay, L. B. (1995). Mechanisms of formation of alkylpyrazines in the Maillard reaction. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 43(11), 2818–2822. doi:10.1021/jf00059a009 · other copies
  6. AEstévez, M.; Ventanas, S.; Heinonen, M. (2011). Formation of Strecker aldehydes between protein carbonyls – α-Aminoadipic and γ-glutamic semialdehydes – and leucine and isoleucine. Food Chemistry 128(4), 1051–1057. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.04.012 · other copies
  7. AKrax, R.; Menneking, K.; Sajapin, J.; Hellwig, M. (2024). Identification of β-aspartic semialdehyde and homocysteine as major reaction products of riboflavin-sensitized photooxidation of peptide-bound methionine. European Food Research and Technology 250, 2331–2342. doi:10.1007/s00217-024-04540-w · other copies
  8. ADelgado, R. M.; Zamora, R.; Hidalgo, F. J. (2015). Contribution of phenolic compounds to food flavors: Strecker-type degradation of amines and amino acids produced by o- and p-diphenols. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 63(1), 312–318. doi:10.1021/jf5047317 · other copies
  9. AHofmann, T.; Czerny, M.; Calligaris, S.; Schieberle, P. (2001). Model Studies on the Influence of Coffee Melanoidins on Flavor Volatiles of Coffee Beverages. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 49(5), 2382–2386. doi:10.1021/jf0012042 · other copies
  10. ASanz, C.; Czerny, M.; Cid, C.; Schieberle, P. (2002). Comparison of potent odorants in a filtered coffee brew and in an instant coffee beverage by aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA). European Food Research and Technology 214(4), 299–302. doi:10.1007/s00217-001-0459-9 · other copies
  11. BMestdagh, F.; Glabasnia, A.; Giuliano, P. (2017). The Brew – Extracting for Excellence. In: Folmer, B. (ed.), The Craft and Science of Coffee, Academic Press, ch. 15, pp. 355–380. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-803520-7.00015-3 · other copies
  12. ABaggenstoss, J.; Poisson, L.; Kaegi, R.; Perren, R.; Escher, F. (2008). Coffee Roasting and Aroma Formation: Application of Different Time−Temperature Conditions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56(14), 5836–5846. doi:10.1021/jf800327j · other copies
  13. BBaggenstoss, J. (2008). Coffee roasting and quenching technology – formation and stability of aroma compounds (Diss. ETH No. 17696). ETH Zürich (doctoral thesis). doi:10.3929/ethz-a-005666902 · other copies
  14. AAlstrup, J.; Petersen, M. A.; Larsen, F. H.; Münchow, M. (2020). The Effect of Roast Development Time Modulations on the Sensory Profile and Chemical Composition of the Coffee Brew as Measured by NMR and DHS-GC–MS. Beverages 6(4), 70. doi:10.3390/beverages6040070 · other copies
  15. BYeretzian, C.; Blank, I.; Wyser, Y. (2017). Protecting the Flavors – Freshness as a Key to Quality (chapter 14). In: Folmer, B. (ed.), The Craft and Science of Coffee, Academic Press, ch. 14, pp. 329–353. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-803520-7.00014-1 · other copies
  16. BSmrke, S.; Sage, E.; Wellinger, M.; Yeretzian, C. (2018). The Coffee Freshness Handbook (ISBN 978-0-9995807-2-1). Specialty Coffee Association, Santa Ana.
  17. AGeiger, R.; Perren, R.; Kuenzli, R.; Escher, F. (2005). Carbon Dioxide Evolution and Moisture Evaporation During Roasting of Coffee Beans. Journal of Food Science 70(2), E124–E130. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb07084.x · other copies

Tier A · authoritative · B · trade and expert · C · general. Supporting quotes for every source are in the data version of this entry. If a publisher’s site refuses access, try the doi link or “other copies”.

Suggest a change

On Strecker degradation. Tell us what you would change and why. A source that supports it helps most.